Everything about Saunders-roe Sr 53 totally explained
» For State Route 53 or State Road 53, see list of highways numbered 53.
The
Saunders-Roe SR.53 was a prototype
interceptor aircraft of mixed
jet and
rocket propulsion developed for the
Royal Air Force in the early 1950s. Although its performance was promising, the need for such an aircraft was soon overtaken by
surface-to-air missile development, and the project was cancelled after forty-two test flights.
Development
The
Second World War demonstrated the importance of
strategic bombing to modern warfare, and as the
Cold War developed, devising effective air defence against large waves of enemy
bomber aircraft became a priority for many nations.
Nazi Germany had looked to rocket-powered aircraft to fill this niche, with machines like the
Messerschmitt Me 163 and
Bachem Ba 349, which were capable of unparalleled rates-of-climb, enabling them to (at least in theory) rise to meet and intercept enemy bombers before they reached their targets. German rocket technology was studied extensively by the Allies in the aftermath of the war, and in light of the threat of the growing
Soviet strategic bomber fleet and that nation's newly-developed
atomic weapons, the
UK's
Air Ministry drafted a requirement (O.R.301) in May
1951 for a rocket-powered interceptor that could reach an altitude of 60,000 ft (18,300 m) in just 2 minutes 30 seconds. This was circulated to the nation's
aircraft manufacturers the following February.
Of the seven companies that tendered designs, two were selected for development contracts,
A.V. Roe with their
Avro 720 and
Saunders-Roe with their
SR.53. The SR-53 itself was a sleek aircraft with a sharply pointed nose,
delta-like wing, and a
T-tail. The jet and rocket exhausts were mounted one atop the other in the tail.
By September
1953 the programme to develop these aircraft came under scrutiny due to cost cuts, and the Avro 720 was abandoned, although it seemed almost ready to fly at this point. One of the reasons for preferring the SR.53 was although the aircraft was developmentally behind, its use of
hydrogen peroxide as an
oxidiser was viewed as less problematic than the Avro 720's use of
liquid oxygen. Nevertheless, a series of setbacks, including an explosion during ground tests of the engine, saw the aircraft's first flight fall further and further behind schedule. At the same time, Saunders-Roe began work on a derivative design, the
SR.177, adapting the SR.53 design for maritime use by the
Royal Navy and the
German Navy.
It was
1957 before the aircraft was to take to the air, just over a month after the infamous
1957 Defence White Paper had been published outlining the British government's policy to largely abandon piloted aircraft in favour of concentrating on missile development. At the same time, jet engine development had progressed a long way in the six years since the SR.53's initial design. Combined with the fact that improvements in
radar had meant that any incoming bomber threat could be detected much earlier, the need for an aircraft like the SR.53 had disappeared, and, unsurprisingly, the project was cancelled. One of the two SR.53 prototypes is preserved at the
RAF Museum at
Cosford near
Wolverhampton. The other crashed during testing, killing its pilot.
Operators
Specifications
Further Information
Get more info on 'Saunders-roe Sr 53'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://saunders-roe_sr_53.totallyexplained.com">Saunders-Roe SR.53 Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |